Monday, December 4, 2023

Particle Beam Weapons: Technology Areas, Advantages and Limitations

- Advertisement -

The propagation problem is more severe in the case of charged-particle beam through atmosphere as compared to that of neutral-particle beam through space. Propagation of a neutral-particle beam does not suffer from beam instability problems possibly encountered by a charged-particle beam while propagating through atmosphere.

One of the contributing factors is beam spreading, which causes increase in beam diameter and consequent decrease in energy density as it travels towards the target. Even with a small amount of beam divergence, the beam diameter may become appreciable enough to be unacceptable for longer ranges.

Two factors contribute to beam spreading: beam divergence imparted by the accelerator itself and present at the exit of the accelerator, and mutual repulsion of beam particles. While in the case of charged-particle beams both the factors are responsible for beam spreading, it would strictly originate from accelerator in the case of neutral-particle beams.
Even in the case of a neutral-particle beam propagating through atmosphere, the surrounding air molecules strip the neutral particles of the electrons and transform it into a charged-particle beam. This would further lead to undesirable beam divergence

- Advertisement -

In the atmosphere, however, even if the beam particles were neutral, air molecules would strip the surrounding electrons quickly from the beam’s neutral atoms, turning the beam into a charged-particle beam. The charged particles within the beam would then tend to repel one another, producing undesirable beam divergence. The unwanted effect is countered to some extent as the propagating beam may knock off electrons from air molecules, which would in turn intermingle with the beam and neutralise the charged particles. The magnetic field created by the charged-particle beam current also prevents beam spreading by producing a type of conduit. For a charged-particle beam to propagate satisfactorily through the atmosphere, the particle beam needs to have certain threshold values of beam parameters including beam current, particle energy and pulse duration.
The problem is still looking for a solution as currently no particle-beam accelerator is capable of producing a beam with the required parameters. Two important experimental programmes with particle accelerator are exploring the phenomenon of particle-beam propagation through atmosphere. One of these relates to the experiments with Advanced Test Accelerator (ATA) at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and the other is a joint Air Force/Sandia National Laboratories programme through the use of Radial-pulse-line Accelerator (RADLAC).


Lethality studies play an important role in understanding the precise effect a particle beam would have on interaction with different types of target materials. The subject becomes further complex as the particle beam-matter interaction would depend upon type of particles in the beam, particle energy and beam power. Parameters determining lethality and hence the efficacy of the beam weapon include beam velocity, dwell time, rapid retargeting capability, beam penetration, ancillary kill mechanisms and all-weather capability.

A beam velocity that is much higher than the target speed simplifies the task of fixing the aim point even in the case of an evasive target. As an example, a target at a distance of 50km and moving at a supersonic speed of 6 Mach would have moved only a metre or so from the time the particle beam weapon is fired till it hits the target. This is made possible by the particle beam travelling at near speed of light of 3×105 km/s. The beam dwell time—the time period for which the particle beam is needed to remain on the aim point on the target to inflict intended damage—is of the order of a few microseconds in the case of endoatmospheric weapons. In this case, beam power is sufficient enough to cause almost instantaneous damage. Short dwell times may be required in case of exoatmospheric beam weapons due to comparatively lesser power of these weapons.

Rapid retargeting feature of the particle-beam weapons gives them the capability of engaging multiple targets. This is made possible as the charged-particle beam can be deflected in the desired direction, within certain limits, with the help of a changing magnetic field. Unlike high-energy laser weapons, where the laser-matter interaction effects are mainly confined to the surface, particle beams have much greater penetration. The structural damage in this case is far more severe, sometimes leading even to a catastrophic damage.

Also, in the case of laser-induced damage, the material blowing off from the target surface tends to envelop or hide the target, thereby acting as a protective shield. Particle-beam weapons with their penetrating nature do not suffer from this problem. Even target hardening through shielding materials selection proves to be ineffective.


  1. In 1967 when I designed the tri-beam system which uses a negatively-charged particle beam and a positively-charged particle beam aimed at a central negatively-charged particle beam that is the driving beam, a semi-neutral wrap would be formed to keep the beam coherent until it hits its target. I suggested to President Nixon in 1970 in a letter that there should be a satellite defense system that used my power ray to shoot down missiles and warheads. It took me until 1977 to design my injection reactor which would provide the charged particles. Several years ago I designed a hyperlight speed reactor which used my injection reactor to provide the charged particles that would be run through a series of cyclotrons so that when the particles almost come in contact with other charged particles, repulsion would push the particles beyond the speed of light. When the particles are accelerated enough, they would be merged into a single beam using my tri-beam system that I so powerful due to the increased energy mass that a laser compared to a power ray that is traveling at high hyperlight speed would be like comparing a kite with a Saturn V rocket. Hyperlight speed reactors would be used by repulsion-drive engines to allow vessels to travel to the stars and eventually beyond the borders of the universe.


Electronics News

Truly Innovative Tech

MOst Popular Videos

Electronics Components